As you've asked and only because you've asked. Although I have to ask, did that one factor settle the probably many others raised?
If you think about it, the programme you watched wouldn't serve very well as propaganda if it didn't hold up the official story.
A word on Al-queda/Osama bin Laden - al queda is simply the name of the database of mujahadeen fighters recruited, trained, armed and funded by the U.S. to combat the Russians many years ago, spear-heading this operation was Zibigniew Brezesinski (his writings discuss the need for manufactured provacation to engage in war i.e. false flag ops), defence secretary for the carter administration and consulting in defense and foriegn policy in practically every administration since. That's where the term al-queda comes from , a list of mititants with ties to the muslim botherhood recruited and facilitated by the U.S.
We've now gone from Al-queda being a bitter enemy to now working with them in Libya, guys who 5-6 years ago were killing coalition forces are now fighting with/under them. How does that work ? It works becuase Al-queda were always meant to be an "enemy" down the line to get us into the middle east and anywhere else recources and regime changes were required by merely stating "connections to Al-queda". Next in line in the Al-queda hierarchy dined at the pentagon after 9/11, wtf ?
http://www.cbsnews.c...in6978200.shtmlOne of the best political/military philosophies I've come to learn is you set up your own enemy as opposed to letting one form naturally, this way you can control it and people who think they are against you are actually under very close scrutiny.
Osama bin Laden's C.I.A code name was Tim Osman and has been their asset for years since his part in the afformentioned operation against the Russians. The Bin Laden family have been doing business with the Bush's for years in the oil industry and via the Carlyle group (massive holding firm dealing largely in the arms trade) The Bin Laden and the Bush's are both mojor shareholders. If Osama bin Laden is responsible for 9/11, then why did the FBI state that had no evidence to support this and it was never listed under his name on their site as one of the things he was wanted for? (Along with other agencies who stated their was no evidence of his involvement). The guy was in hospital with severe kydney failure in june 2001, and highly likely he died shortly thereafter. Ever noticed there was at least 3 different guys used in the video messages from "him" released throughout the years. If you think his capture and killing was legit then you'll find with research that's full of holes too. Did you know the seal team involved in that operation are now all dead ? Plus numerous previous occasions where Osama and other top imams involved in Al-queda could have been captured but were hindered by top brass in U.S. military.
You also need to understand what a patsy is- I make out to a bunch of disallusioned yound Islamic guys I'm down for Jihad against the great satan and give them lots of nice things and train them up to commit acts of terror, when all along I'm top level F.B.I/C.I.A/secret service/MI6 operative. I've created the dialectic required to carry what was stated in the Neo-con penned "Project for a New American century", before 9/11 calling for a new pearl harbour" Think about those words - Project for a new American century and where we are now.
Other examples of staged provacation for war and purging a percieved enemies actvities are Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam, Reischtag fire - communist/anti government purge - USS Maine and so on.
Osama bin Laden stating Al-queda's involvement hardly puts the issue to bed really, considering he stated he had no involvement.
